Publication Details

Comparison of light field compression methods

BAŘINA, D.; ŠOLONY, M.; CHLUBNA, T.; DLABAJA, D.; KLÍMA, O.; ZEMČÍK, P. Comparison of light field compression methods. MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, vol. 81, no. 2, p. 2517-2528. ISSN: 1573-7721.
Czech title
Srovnání metod pro kompresi světelného pole
Type
journal article
Language
English
Authors
Keywords

4D light fields, Plenoptic imaging, Compression, Image refocusing, 3D Reconstruction

Abstract

In this article, we compare the impact of state-of-the-art light field compression methods. It addresses quality of (a) refocused images and (b) point clouds reconstructed from 4D light field data. The methods include recent video compression formats, specifically H.265, AV1, XVC, and H.266/VVC (finalized in 2020). In addition, we have extended a standard image compression method into four dimensions and compared it with the video compression formats. It turned out that the new VVC format demonstrated superior performance, closely followed by the underrated XVC. Apart from the comparison, we show that the four-dimensional light field data can be compressed with a higher ratio than independent still images while maintaining the same visual quality of a perceived picture.

Published
2022
Pages
2517–2528
Journal
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, vol. 81, no. 2, ISSN 1573-7721
DOI
UT WoS
000712943000001
EID Scopus
BibTeX
@article{BUT173061,
  author="David {Bařina} and Marek {Šolony} and Tomáš {Chlubna} and Drahomír {Dlabaja} and Ondřej {Klíma} and Pavel {Zemčík}",
  title="Comparison of light field compression methods",
  journal="MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS",
  year="2022",
  volume="81",
  number="2",
  pages="2517--2528",
  doi="10.1007/s11042-021-11645-x",
  issn="1573-7721",
  url="https://www.fit.vut.cz/research/publication/12613/"
}
Back to top